Behind
the GOP focus on Obamacare
By: Jake Sherman and Lauren
French
July 15, 2014 11:00 PM EDT - POLITICO
There is no shortage of actions that House Republicans see as illegal
overreach by President Barack Obama.
They were furious when he bypassed Congress to swap Guantánamo Bay
detainees for an American prisoner of war. They were angry when he tweaked
immigration law without congressional approval. They considered taking him
to court for both.
But instead of a multipronged legal assault against the Obama White
House in the middle of an election year, Speaker John Boehner is training
his fire on the issue that has most animated the GOP since it took control
of the House in 2011: Obamacare. Republicans are betting they can
translate their success in making the law politically potent into a legal
victory.
The lawsuit — which will have its first congressional hearing Wednesday
— is based entirely on Obamafs decision to delay a mandate in the health
care overhaul that most employers provide health insurance to workers.
The decision to focus on Obamacare was surprising to some who expected
a more sweeping legal action. But Republicans leading the effort say the
health care overhaul is the best case they can bring to a judge.
gWefre not trying to take every issue that we disagree with the
president on,h said House Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions, who will
lead the Wednesday hearing. gWefre going to pick that one that we believe
has a lot of merit and widely recognized as an important issue.h
Proving that Obama misused his executive power is a long shot, most
Republicans privately concede. Some even say that it is simply a way to
quiet down the growing number of fringe Republicans who have said the
party should move to impeach the president.
Obama and congressional Democrats are publicly dismissing talk of the
lawsuit as little more than a desperate move by Republicans in the months
before an election.
But senior GOP leadership aides describe a deliberate effort behind the
scenes that they say gives them a fighting chance of defeating a sitting
president in court.
gThe wheels of justice may grind slowly, but they do grind and we are
confident the court will decide in our favor against executive overreach,h
a senior GOP leadership aide said.
For Boehner, incoming Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and
incoming Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.), the political downside of pursuing a
lawsuit is minimal. Their rapport with the president is at an all-time low
and going after Obama is never unpopular in the rightward-leaning House
Republican Conference.
Republicans have already proved that they are unafraid to show an
almost singular focus on undermining the law — they shut down the
government over its funding last year. Despite their failure to defund the
law and the unpopularity of the shutdown, the GOP is still poised to
expand its majority in the November midterm elections.
Of course, Boehner could emerge with a splatter of egg on his face. If
the House loses the suit, it will be his second consecutive defeat in
court. The Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act after
Boehner spent millions of dollars defending it. The price tag for this
suit is sure to be similar, but a senior GOP leadership aide said itfs
gsimply too soon to knowh how much the Office of the House General Counsel
will shell out. Top Republicans do concede that the legal proceedings will
be lengthy.
But, this time, they say they have a winning strategy: Show that
Congress has shown willingness to delay the employer mandate, but Obama
went around Capitol Hill instead.
gThe House has attempted to delay the employer mandate and instead of
working with Congress, the president not only delayed Obamacare once, but
twice; the second time creating his own legislative scheme for enforcement
on categories of employers,h a Republican aide said. gThese changes in law
are beyond his constitutional authority and violated his duty to
faithfully execute the law. By unilaterally making these changes, he has
bypassed the constitutional requirement for amending statutory law —
Congress legislates and the president executes.h
Unlike the DOMA case, which was authorized through the Bipartisan Legal
Advisory Group — a panel made up of congressional leaders — Boehner is
bringing a resolution to the floor in order to geliminate any question
about whether the litigation is authorized by the House,h the aide
said.
Before this lawsuit even reaches a courtroom, it will occupy the
attention of Capitol Hill in the few days remaining before the November
election.
First, on Wednesday, the Rules Committeefs first hearing will feature
testimony from Elizabeth Price Foley, a professor from Florida
International University College of Law; Jonathan Turley, a professor of
public interest law at The George Washington University; Simon Lazarus of
the Constitutional Accountability Center; and Walter Dellinger, a partner
at OfMelveny & Myers.
Next week, the committee will mark up the resolution, and then it will
hit the House floor. The vote to authorize the suit will almost certainly
be along party lines.
GOP lawmakers involved in Obamacare oversight say they see absolutely
no downside.
gWhen people say is there a risk of doing this, of course there is.
Anytime you go to court, by definition, one side wins and one side loses,h
said Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Texas), a physician who is vice chairman of
the Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health. gIs there a risk? Yes, of
course there is a risk but the risk of inactivity, the risk of doing
nothing, the risk of no action is that you can logically infer from this
that anything passed by Congress can be changed by the president at any
point that he feels it is inconvenient for him to go forward.h
The health subcommitteefs chairman, Rep. Joe Pitts, said even if the
lawsuit fails, it shines light on Obamafs actions.
gHefs abused his power, and everyone is very, very aware now that he
abused his executive authority by administrative actions, by executive
orders,h the Pennsylvania Republican said.
© 2014 POLITICO LLC |